Home: Projects

 Further Information Publications  

IPROSEC

Improving Policy Responses and Outcomes to Socio-Economic Challenges: changing family structures, policy and practice

 

First IPROSEC project workshop - July 2000 »»»

IMPROVING POLICY RESPONSES AND OUTCOMES TO SOCIO-ECONOMIC CHALLENGES: CHANGING FAMILY STRUCTURES, POLICY AND PRACTICE (IPROSEC)

European Commission Framework Programme 5
(HPSE–CT–1999–00031)

1 March 2000–30 April 2003

PROJECT ABSTRACT

The IPROSEC project brought together social scientists from eight EU member states (France, Germany, Greece, Ireland, Italy, Spain, Sweden, United Kingdom) and three candidate countries (Estonia, Hungary, Poland), representing different waves of EU membership and welfare arrangements. The research was designed to inform policy by developing a greater understanding of socio-demographic change in Europe, the social and economic challenges such change presents, and the efficacy of the policy responses formulated by national governments and at EU level. The project was particularly concerned with changing family structures and relationships and their interface with policy. The project team analysed the policy process, inputs, outcomes and impacts and assessed the potential for cross-border learning and policy development.

Comparative statistical analysis of socio-economic change (population decline and ageing, family structure, gender, intergenerational relations) shows that, in the closing decades of the 20th century, trends were generally moving in the same direction, but not all countries started from the same base, and change occurred at a different rate and pace both between and within countries.

While population growth has been slowing down across Europe, and population ageing has become a widespread phenomenon, Ireland is the country least affected by these two trends. The candidate countries are also distinguished by their relatively large young population, but, in their case, it is accompanied by negative population growth, due essentially to their much lower life expectancy. Population ageing is relatively advanced in Germany, Greece, Italy and Sweden and is generally found in combination with comparatively high old age family dependency. Family formation is being delayed and, everywhere, de-institutionalized family forms are becoming more common, despite marked differences in the timing of marriage and births. Sweden and Estonia are characterized by the most advanced stage of development of alternative living arrangements. Ireland, Italy and Spain have retained more traditional family forms. Poland is the outlier in this respect combining traditional family forms with conventional timing of family formation. Indicators of changing gender relations set Sweden apart from the other EU member states in terms of equality of opportunity and work–life balance. Gender equality has weakened in the three candidate countries since the ending of Soviet rule. Ireland, Greece, Italy and Spain are the countries most distinguished by relatively poor equality of opportunity in combination with work-life imbalance.

Although many of the challenges raised are similar, policy context analysis and interviews with policy actors, including family members, indicate that the approaches adopted by governments in response to change vary according to the policy environment, the political and economic climate and the legitimacy and social acceptability of state intervention in family life. The IPROSEC countries fall into several clusters in terms of the historical development of their family policy, its design and structure, and the vehicles used for delivery. At the one extreme, in France and Sweden, policy is highly structured and legitimated. Policy actors are strongly committed to supporting families. At the other, in the southern European and candidate countries, policy is more hesitant, lacking in coherence and under-resourced. Between the two extremes are countries, including Germany, Ireland and the United Kingdom, where the rhetoric is supportive of families, but where policy actors are often reluctant to intervene in private life. Universalistic, or ‘one-size-fits-all’, solutions to socio-economic problems across Europe are not, therefore, appropriate in the area of family life.

Comparative analysis of the research materials suggests a number of conditions that must be met if family policy is to be effective. A family-friendly and supportive social environment is needed, founded on the principles of equality of opportunity, social solidarity and vertical redistribution of resources. Economic security must be ensured, based on a high level of employment and the guarantee of a living wage or minimum income, making work pay. An equitable and consensual sharing of responsibilities is essential between political, economic and civil society policy actors, with aims and objectives clearly communicated to the public. Effective mechanisms are needed for funding, co-ordination across sectors, and for implementation and delivery of a good standard of benefits and services. Public policy intervention in family life must command widespread legitimacy, acceptability and confidence. Policy needs to be responsive and non-intrusive, to go with the grain of social change and to complement family responsibilities.

Click here for further information

For information on similar projects, go to http://improving-ser.sti.jrc.it/default/

 

 Further Information Publications